DRAFT Recommendations

Moderator: SC Moderators

Locked
User avatar
Rosie Gray
Forum Wizard
Forum Wizard
Posts: 1821
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 9:47 am
Location: west-coast Canada

DRAFT Recommendations

Post by Rosie Gray »

Note that this is a draft of the report, and that all the commission members and advisors will be able to make comments and vote on its acceptance before being brought to the RA.

DRAFT: CDS RA New Sim Commission Report
October, 2014


This commission was convened at the behest of the 21st RA.

Members, including special advisors, for final report: Rosie Gray (RA member and chair), Leslie Allandale - citizen, Patroklus Murakami - citizen, Arria Perreault -SC member), Gaius Tiberius Curio - citizen, Gwyneth Llewelyn - RA member, Widget Whiteberry - citizen
a. Type of region (full region, homestead, void)
* recommendations: purchase 2 full regions, searching for best deals on used regions

b. Placement of region
* recommendations: 1 region to be placed west of NFS, and the other to be placed east of NFS

c. Region theme
* recommendations: NFS W be a rural, Alpine Medieval themed sim set in modern times. NFS E be an identical theme as NFS, with an allowance for modern architecture in the rural section of it.

* Supported by Citizen Survey and in world discussions open to all citizens:
findings: see full survey results here:https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByGHT4 ... NWZVU/view. 50 individual people responded to the survey.

survey results showed of respondents 15.91% agree and 29.55% strongly agree with wanting Bavarian e.g. Neufreistadt as a theme. The second highest rated was Alpine e.g. Alpine Meadow and Monastery with 34.09% agreeing and 18.18% strongly agreeing. 83.33% want residential parcels, 68.75% want parkland/forest/nature reserve, 56.25% want gathering spots, 41.67% want beaches/water, 33.33% want conference/teaching spaces, 27.08% want ‘other’ (see full survey for comments), 25% want commercial parcels.

* findings from citizen input meetings (Leslie Allandale analysis):
The results of the public meetings are hard to quantify, as specific responses to even specific questions would shift into new ground. In addition, topics discussed in older meetings would be on the agenda for newer ones, but, obviously, not vice versa, so the support of topics brought up early would be skewed in the chart. However, I pulled out 28 common topics and pasted the results into the accompanying chart. There may have been more, however I was concerned with trends, and these seemed the most germane. In my opinion a careful scan of the chart shows several trends, which may, or may not, significantly parallel universal feelings. However we may assume that it indicates the position of concerned citizens.

I. Sims:
64% of the attendees supported the placement of a new sim in the empty position west of NFS.
41% voiced approved of Timo’s plan. However, though a design contest was discussed (14% approving) no competing plans for this site were offered.

Only 23% approved of a water sim, with one disapproving, however 59% of the attendees supported a land/water region (some with qualifications).

Other Grids: There was only qualified support for establishing a region on a foreign grid, however 18% would support a measured move, with one person dissenting.

II Usage:
There was little to no discussion of personal commitment to using the land.
However, most were interested in t e features to be provided, especially as a core attraction (14%) with many different ideas presented: Library – 9%; School-32%; Airport-18%: Meeting space-23%; Ski lodge-18%; Water feature-9%, Riding trail-5%.

III. Theme:
Followed no consistent pattern, Alpine-18%, American woodland-9%, Rural-5%, Venetian-18%,
IV. Other:
A few asked for planning carefully (9%) while Cleo wanted a full head of steam.
A response to adding increased tier across the existing regions to support a new one, covered the spectrum: 9%-no, 18%-maybe, 18%-yes.
One more caveat: A blank space does not mean that an attendee had no opinion, only that they did not respond, for any number of reasons, to that particular topic in one of our meetings.

d. Procedures for the new region creative process i.e. building, terraforming, gardening etc.
recommendations: call for design proposals on NFS east and west, with instructions to focus on the comments submitted to the new-sim commission through its survey and during its meetings. Bidders to demonstrate the ways in which their design responds to public comments as well as Commission instruction.
recommendations: request the newly established CDS Land-Use Commission to manage the creation of the new sims, as per their mandate.

e. Draft legislation for the acquisition of a new region or regions
draft:




r. Consider finances, balance of public and private prims and any specific public spaces appropriate to the theme.
* recommendations: adopt Trebor's analysis as the primary guide in determining the finances of a new sim. with some flexibility be allowed in consideration of public space useage
"Courage, my friend, it's not too late to make the world a better place."
~ Tommy Douglas

Locked

Return to “New Region Commission -21st RA”