Bill proposals: Citizenship and Electoral Reform

Proposals for legislation and discussions of these

Moderator: SC Moderators

User avatar
Sudane Erato
Forum Wizard
Forum Wizard
Posts: 1183
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 8:44 am
Contact:

Re: Bill proposals: Citizenship and Electoral Reform

Post by Sudane Erato »

I support Calli's proposed wording. On matters of "feasibility" it is very do-able.

But I must repeat one important issue for implementing this. The land owner list from the Land Scanner system is NOT yet do-able. Timo Gufler, the creator of the Land Scanner system, and I have been discussing adding this feature, and he indicates that it should be straightforward. But it is not yet made, and I cannot guarantee it before the next election deadline.

Without this system, generating this list would be a nightmare, prone to errors. Should Calli's wording pass, and I hope it does, please append a note that for this first election, we will qualify citizens with the Hippo list only. That will not certify that a Hippo box payer actually owns the land they are paying for, but it has proven extremely rare that they do not, and I think we can get through one election with this limited definition.

Once the Land Scanner is able to generate an owners list, we can routinely publish both lists if the RA so desires.

Sudane.................................

*** Confirmed Grump ***
Profile: http://bit.ly/p9ASqg
User avatar
Patroklus Murakami
Forum Wizard
Forum Wizard
Posts: 1929
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 5:54 pm

Re: Bill proposals: Citizenship and Electoral Reform

Post by Patroklus Murakami »

Thank you to Calli and Sudane for your thoughts on the proposed legislation.

On the issue of payment for parcels, I am happy to go with a free parcel or a minimal fee. I have not been notified by anybody that this law will affect them and I'm only aware of one remaining 'partner' citizen who will be affected by this law change. I suggest we debate this in RA and choose one of the alternate wordings in the bill below.

Again, on priority for civil service positions, I'm happy to delete paragraph 9 in Bill #1 below if the RA wants to.

I think that Calli's redrafted Bill #2 is a big improvement on the previous drafting so I suggest we use this. I've updated paragraph 1 to include a variation for these elections if the Land Scanner upgrade is not ready in time. This follows from Sudane's post on the topic.

Bill #1: Citizenship Establishment

Preamble

CDSL 13-10, Citizenship Bill, attempted to define more precisely the link between citizenship and land established as a fundamental principle in the Constitution of the Confederation of Democratic Simulators (CDS) in its Article VI – Citizenship, by establishing guidelines on how to incorporate the citizenship grant made to citizens who used previous laws to become citizens without a direct relationship with land ownership.

However, in subsequent events, it was made clear that the extraordinary amount of legislation covering all possible cases for citizenship complicated the establishment of an official List of Citizens as per the requirements of NL 5-15, Citizen Information Act. As a result, this list is rarely updated and requires individual validation of each and every member on the list.

Therefore, this bill provides a new and easier method to validate citizenship by keeping to the guidelines set forth in the Constitution.

  • 1. "Granting title to land" is henceforward defined as being listed as the sole proprietor of a parcel of land, as shown by the About Land tool (or whatever technological feature of the official Second Life Viewer shows the ownership of a parcel).
    2. Citizens shall be entitled to vote in CDS elections and/or stand for office if, on the date set by the Scientific Council in accordance with the Constitution for this purpose, they own at least one parcel of land and are current in their tier payments for at least one parcel. A citizen shall be an individual avatar whose name appears on both the Hippo list as being current in the tier payments and on a list of current parcel owners.
    3. Private land can optionally be set (but not deeded) to any group, but that does not entitle any member of the group a grant to the title of the land. Mistakenly deeded land should be reverted, optionally with the assistance from the Estate Owner or any similar role with the appropriate land management powers.
    4. Public land, or land owned by organisations incorporated in the CDS, can be deeded to a group. As per the previous article, this does not grant members of the group any title to the land.
    5. "Sponsored locations" in the terms previously defined under CDSL 13-10 are abolished. Land set or deeded to groups under the provision of CDSL 13-10 will revert to public land status and claimed by the appropriate land management group set by Government for the region.
    6. Citizenship derived solely through membership of a group or through being the partner of a CDS citizen is hereby abolished.
    7. Membership in any "waiting list" for acquisition of a first parcel in the CDS, to be sold by Government as soon as new regions or parcels are opened for sale, does not confer citizenship status to those members, since it does not effectively confer grant title to land.
    8. Any citizen that loses their citizenship status due to the passage of this bill is encouraged to purchase a parcel of land in the CDS and shall be entitled to [a waiver of the land ownership/transfer cost/a discount purchase price of $L/sq m], only in the case that the parcel bought is the property of the CDS Government, and only for the first parcel purchased under this provision. Any citizen purchasing a parcel through the provisions of this Act will only be permitted to sell the parcel back to the CDS Government for the price paid.
    9. [Citizens losing their status due to the revocation of CDSL 13-10, when buying their first parcel of land in the CDS, will have priority in applying for any paid Civil Service role (under the provision of NL 5-7, Civil Service Act, and subsequent legislation), in case any such new role is announced or an existing role has a vacancy, provided that the candidate has the adequate competences and skills required to apply for that role.]

----------------------------------------------------------
Bill #2: Citizenship membership publication for election purposes

Preamble

It is the law of the CDS that citizens must hold the title to their land for more than 28 days, and have tier payed in full to qualify to vote or to run for office. However, due to the complexities of the electoral calendar, the validation of that requirement is unnecessarily complicated.

The Citizen List shall be the certified list of CDS citizens eligible to run for office or vote in CDS Elections. The Citizen List will be created in the following manner:

  • 1. At 12 noon on the dates designated by the Scientific Council, the Estate Manager or his or her designate, will generate both a Hippo list of tier payors and a Land Scanner list of parcel owners. They will then compare these two lists to determine that a given name appears on both lists, and that that given name is current in at least one parcel tier payment. The Estate Manager or his or her designate will use these lists to create one list of the citizens who are qualified to run for office or vote, the Citizen List. (In the event that the upgrade to the Land Scanner is not available in time for the generation of the Citizen List for the June 2012 elections, the Hippo List alone will be used).

    2. Within 24 hours this List will be delivered to the Chancellor, who will publish the List on the CDS Forums, by notecard to the SL group 'CDS', by notecard available at the Praetorium and any other public location the Chancellor may choose, and on the CDS web portal.

    3. Only those citizens whose names appear on the published Citizen List may run for office or vote in the CDS elections.

    4. Any citizen may challenge the inclusion or omission of an avatar on the Citizen List by petitioning the Scientific Council. Any such petition challenging the Citizen List must be received by the Dean of the SC no later than midnight, 21 days after that Citizen List is published. The SC will make every effort to resolve such challenges within 7 days, so that nominations and elections can proceed with an accurate Citizen List.

    5. This bill revokes NL 5-17, Census Scheduling Act. The number of seats in the Representative Assembly shall be calculated on the day the Citizen List is published for the express purpose of determining citizen eligibility to vote.

    6. This bill applies to all elections and by-elections of Government members, representatives, or any official polling act called by any of the Government Branches (such as referenda or public consultation) that may have legislative power.

    7. This bill does not revoke any other right of citizens, specifically NL 5-21, Citizen Involvement Act, or any public contest without the force of legislative power, such as proposing a new theme for an upcoming region to be publicly opened, redesigning the CDS official presence, or similar non-legislative acts.

Honi soit qui mal y pense
User avatar
Patroklus Murakami
Forum Wizard
Forum Wizard
Posts: 1929
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 5:54 pm

Re: Bill proposals: Citizenship and Electoral Reform

Post by Patroklus Murakami »

The RA passed the following amended versions of both bills on Citizenship and Electoral Reform at its meeting on 17 March 2012. Summary and Transcript are here.

Ayes - Anna, Patroklus, Rosie, Shep. Beathan has a 7-day vote.

Bill #1: Citizenship Establishment

Preamble

CDSL 13-10, Citizenship Bill, attempted to define more precisely the link between citizenship and land established as a fundamental principle in the Constitution of the Confederation of Democratic Simulators (CDS) in its Article VI - Citizenship, by establishing guidelines on how to incorporate the citizenship grant made to citizens who used previous laws to become citizens without a direct relationship with land ownership.

However, in subsequent events, it was made clear that the extraordinary amount of legislation covering all possible cases for citizenship complicated the establishment of an official List of Citizens as per the requirements of NL 5-15, Citizen Information Act. As a result, this list is rarely updated and requires individual validation of each and every member on the list.

Therefore, this bill provides a new and easier method to validate citizenship by keeping to the guidelines set forth in the Constitution.

  • 1. "Granting title to land" is henceforward defined as being listed as the sole proprietor of a parcel of land, as shown by the About Land tool (or whatever technological feature of the official Second Life Viewer shows the ownership of a parcel).

    2. Citizens shall be entitled to vote in CDS elections and/or stand for office if, on the date set by the Scientific Council in accordance with the Constitution for this purpose, they own at least one parcel of land and are current in their tier payments for at least one parcel. A citizen shall be an individual avatar whose name appears on both the Hippo list as being current in the tier payments and on a list of current parcel owners.

    3. Private land can optionally be set (but not deeded) to any group, but that does not entitle any member of the group a grant to the title of the land. Mistakenly deeded land should be reverted, optionally with the assistance from the Estate Owner or any similar role with the appropriate land management powers.

    4. Public land, or land owned by organisations incorporated in the CDS, can be deeded to a group. As per the previous article, this does not grant members of the group any title to the land.

    5. "Sponsored locations" in the terms previously defined under CDSL 13-10 are abolished. Land set or deeded to groups under the provision of CDSL 13-10 will revert to public land status and claimed by the appropriate land management group set by Government for the region.

    6. Citizenship derived solely through membership of a group or through being the partner of a CDS citizen is hereby abolished.

    7. Membership in any "waiting list" for acquisition of a first parcel in the CDS, to be sold by Government as soon as new regions or parcels are opened for sale, does not confer citizenship status to those members, since it does not effectively confer grant title to land.

    8. Any citizen that loses their citizenship status due to the passage of this bill is encouraged to purchase a parcel of land in the CDS.

-------------------------------------
Bill #2: Citizenship membership publication for election purposes

Preamble

It is the law of the CDS that citizens must hold the title to their land for more than 28 days, and have tier payed in full to qualify to vote or to run for office. However, due to the complexities of the electoral calendar, the validation of that requirement is unnecessarily complicated.

The Citizen List shall be the certified list of CDS citizens eligible to run for office or vote in CDS Elections. The Citizen List will be created in the following manner:

  • 1. At 12 noon SLT on the dates designated by the Scientific Council, the Estate Manager or his or her designate, will generate both a Hippo list of tier payors and a Land Scanner list of parcel owners. They will then compare these two lists to determine that a given name appears on both lists, and that that given name is current in at least one parcel tier payment. The Estate Manager or his or her designate will use these lists to create one list of the citizens who are qualified to run for office or vote, the Citizen List. (In the event that the upgrade to the Land Scanner is not available in time for the generation of the Citizen List for the June 2012 elections, the Hippo List alone will be used).

    2. Within 24 hours this List will be delivered to the Chancellor, who will publish the List on the CDS Forums, by notecard to the SL group 'CDS', by notecard available at the Praetorium and any other public location the Chancellor may choose, and on the CDS web portal.

    3. Only those citizens whose names appear on the published Citizen List may run for office or vote in the CDS elections.

    4. Any citizen may challenge the inclusion or omission of an avatar on the Citizen List by petitioning the Scientific Council. Any such petition challenging the Citizen List must be received by the Dean of the SC no later than midnight SLT, 21 days after that Citizen List is published. The SC will make every effort to resolve such challenges within 7 days, so that nominations and elections can proceed with an accurate Citizen List.

    5. This bill revokes NL 5-17, Census Scheduling Act. The number of seats in the Representative Assembly shall be calculated on the day the Citizen List is published for the express purpose of determining citizen eligibility to vote.

    6. This bill applies to all elections and by-elections of Government members, representatives, or any official polling act called by any of the Government Branches (such as referenda or public consultation) that may have legislative power.

    7. This bill does not revoke any other right of citizens, specifically NL 5-21, Citizen Involvement Act, or any public contest without the force of legislative power, such as proposing a new theme for an upcoming region to be publicly opened, redesigning the CDS official presence, or similar non-legislative acts.

Honi soit qui mal y pense
User avatar
Sudane Erato
Forum Wizard
Forum Wizard
Posts: 1183
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 8:44 am
Contact:

Re: Bill proposals: Citizenship and Electoral Reform

Post by Sudane Erato »

Is there a final determination on the key dates for the upcoming election cycle? If so, is there a designated place that one can always go to find them?

Sudane.....................................

*** Confirmed Grump ***
Profile: http://bit.ly/p9ASqg
User avatar
Patroklus Murakami
Forum Wizard
Forum Wizard
Posts: 1929
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 5:54 pm

Re: Bill proposals: Citizenship and Electoral Reform

Post by Patroklus Murakami »

Sudane

The SC has posted the dates here:

Reproduced for convenience below:

----------------------------------------------
The SC was asked to specify the dates relevant to the upcoming election of the 17th RA.

In this post, 'qualification deadline' means the date an avatar must be a full citizen in good standing. A full citizen in good standing is one who has no arrears in tier on the date of the census, whether this tier is on land the citizen owns, or tier paid to qualify as a citizen through any other method permitted by law.

Official Dates for the election of 17th Representative Assembly - 1 June to 30 November 2012

Dean of SC notifies citizens of key dates : March 31 (Forum posting and inworld group notice)
Qualification deadline to run for office : 12 noon SLT April 3 (census generated on this date by Sudane)
Qualification deadline for right to vote: 12 noon SLT April 13 (census generated on this date by Sudane)
Number of RA seats announced: April 14 (Forum posting and inworld group notice)
Deadline for declaration to run: 12 noon SLT May 2
Dean posts official list of candidates: May 4 (Forum posting and inworld group notice)
Campaign officially starts: May 5
Polls open : 12 noon SLT May 12
Polls close: 12 noon SLT May 19

Dean of SC announces names of the new RA when received (Forum posting and inworld group notice)

Inaugural RA Meeting (LRA selection) 26 May 2012

In addition, at the request of the RA, the Dean of the SC will post declarations of candidacy using in-world group notices as they are received. The Dean, or designated members of the SC, will also post periodic reminders by inworld group notices, encouraging citizens to participate in government by standing for election and include the number of candidates currently declared and the number of RA seats available.

Honi soit qui mal y pense
Callipygian
I need a hobby
I need a hobby
Posts: 784
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:25 pm

Re: Bill proposals: Citizenship and Electoral Reform

Post by Callipygian »

Patroklus Murakami wrote:

Sudane

The SC has posted the dates here:

Reproduced for convenience below:

----------------------------------------------
The SC was asked to specify the dates relevant to the upcoming election of the 17th RA.

In this post, 'qualification deadline' means the date an avatar must be a full citizen in good standing. A full citizen in good standing is one who has no arrears in tier on the date of the census, whether this tier is on land the citizen owns, or tier paid to qualify as a citizen through any other method permitted by law.

Official Dates for the election of 17th Representative Assembly - 1 June to 30 November 2012

Dean of SC notifies citizens of key dates : March 31 (Forum posting and inworld group notice)
Qualification deadline to run for office : 12 noon SLT April 3 (census generated on this date by Sudane)
Qualification deadline for right to vote: 12 noon SLT April 13 (census generated on this date by Sudane)
Number of RA seats announced: April 14 (Forum posting and inworld group notice)
Deadline for declaration to run: 12 noon SLT May 2
Dean posts official list of candidates: May 4 (Forum posting and inworld group notice)
Campaign officially starts: May 5
Polls open : 12 noon SLT May 12
Polls close: 12 noon SLT May 19

Dean of SC announces names of the new RA when received (Forum posting and inworld group notice)

Inaugural RA Meeting (LRA selection) 26 May 2012

In addition, at the request of the RA, the Dean of the SC will post declarations of candidacy using in-world group notices as they are received. The Dean, or designated members of the SC, will also post periodic reminders by inworld group notices, encouraging citizens to participate in government by standing for election and include the number of candidates currently declared and the number of RA seats available.

This will now require some rewording to reflect the new legislation, e.g. the Chancellor will now post the List, the census is officially called the Citizen List etc, but since the dates are still the responsibility of the SC, those won't change.

Calli

People often say that, in a democracy, decisions are made by a majority of the people. Of course, that is not true. Decisions are made by a majority of those who make themselves heard and who vote -- a very different thing.

Walter H. Judd
User avatar
Sudane Erato
Forum Wizard
Forum Wizard
Posts: 1183
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 8:44 am
Contact:

Re: Bill proposals: Citizenship and Electoral Reform

Post by Sudane Erato »

Official Dates for the election of 17th Representative Assembly - 1 June to 30 November 2012

Dean of SC notifies citizens of key dates : March 31 (Forum posting and inworld group notice)
Qualification deadline to run for office : 12 noon SLT April 3 (census generated on this date by Sudane)
Qualification deadline for right to vote: 12 noon SLT April 13 (census generated on this date by Sudane)
Number of RA seats announced: April 14 (Forum posting and inworld group notice)
Deadline for declaration to run: 12 noon SLT May 2
Dean posts official list of candidates: May 4 (Forum posting and inworld group notice)
Campaign officially starts: May 5
Polls open : 12 noon SLT May 12
Polls close: 12 noon SLT May 19

Hmm... I have a couple of issues here, in light of the just passed legislation.

First is the lesser issue. Do we really need TWO census-es (sp?)? One 10 days after the other? Would it be so unjust to have a simple qualifying date for both citizenship and office-holding? My intent in asking this question is not so much to presume to impose on the appropriateness of the time of people's residency as qualification for various civic activities.... but more to ask, why ask the executive to do this twice in 10 days? Not that its such a horrible job... I'd like to think we could publish this list every month. But qualifying census-es only 10 days apart. That invites trouble as described in my SECOND issue.

Second is the bigger issue. The new legislation specifies that anyone who feels wrongly excluded from the list shall have the right, within 21 days of the publishing of that list, which will happen no more than 1 day from the gathering of that list; to file a complaint with the SC, which will then have no longer than 7 days to issue a determination. So... anyone who feels wrongly excluded from the list published on April 3 may not have a resolution of their claim until 29 days after the date of the gathering of the list, or approx May 2. Likewise, someone wrongly excluded from the list published on April 13 may not have a resolution until approx May 12.

Folks, the polls are scheduled to open on May 12. If we do not have a final determination of who can vote, AND how many RA seats are being voted for until May 12, then the polls cannot open. Quite honestly, and practically speaking, even if there are no errors in the voting lists as gathered by us, the qualified list WILL be uncertain until that day.

I suspect you'll agree that this issue needs addressing before we can proceed.

Sudane................................

*** Confirmed Grump ***
Profile: http://bit.ly/p9ASqg
User avatar
Patroklus Murakami
Forum Wizard
Forum Wizard
Posts: 1929
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 5:54 pm

Re: Bill proposals: Citizenship and Electoral Reform

Post by Patroklus Murakami »

Sudane Erato wrote:

Hmm... I have a couple of issues here, in light of the just passed legislation.

First is the lesser issue. Do we really need TWO census-es (sp?)? One 10 days after the other? Would it be so unjust to have a simple qualifying date for both citizenship and office-holding? My intent in asking this question is not so much to presume to impose on the appropriateness of the time of people's residency as qualification for various civic activities.... but more to ask, why ask the executive to do this twice in 10 days? Not that its such a horrible job... I'd like to think we could publish this list every month. But qualifying census-es only 10 days apart. That invites trouble as described in my SECOND issue.

Second is the bigger issue. The new legislation specifies that anyone who feels wrongly excluded from the list shall have the right, within 21 days of the publishing of that list, which will happen no more than 1 day from the gathering of that list; to file a complaint with the SC, which will then have no longer than 7 days to issue a determination. So... anyone who feels wrongly excluded from the list published on April 3 may not have a resolution of their claim until 29 days after the date of the gathering of the list, or approx May 2. Likewise, someone wrongly excluded from the list published on April 13 may not have a resolution until approx May 12.

Folks, the polls are scheduled to open on May 12. If we do not have a final determination of who can vote, AND how many RA seats are being voted for until May 12, then the polls cannot open. Quite honestly, and practically speaking, even if there are no errors in the voting lists as gathered by us, the qualified list WILL be uncertain until that day.

I suspect you'll agree that this issue needs addressing before we can proceed.

Sudane................................

I did give both of these issues some thought. I'm relatively relaxed about them but, if people think it is worth it, we could pass the necessary Constitutional Amendments and Bills to deal with them.

The first issue is down to the way the SC has interpreted the Constitution. Their view is that the Constitution says you need to be a citizen 28 days before the nomination date and the day the polls open. Since nominations come on a different day from the day the polls open you get two dates. I did think about whether to propose simplifying this but it was not strictly part of the remit for the Citizenship Transparency Commission. We were looking at simplifying the rules so that we would know unambiguously is or is not a citizen. And, since the SC and others have spent some considerable effort interpreting the Constitution to determine the dates for the elections I was not keen on proposing a simplification which would mean all of this would need changing. If others want to propose a Constitutional Amendment to change this... I'd consider supporting it. I can't speak for the other RA members though and the bar is quite high - four out of five need to agree to make the change.

On the second issue, I did think about whether we could use a shorter period for people to raise objections. The problem is that, if you make it shorter, people will whine that they did not have time to challenge the decision. If someone leaves it until the last minute and only raises an objection at 21 days, and the SC take 7 days to consider the case(s) then you're right, it might take us up to the day the polls open. That's not such a big deal for the individual citizen, they still have up to a week to vote after all. I'm not convinced it's a problem for determining the size of the RA either. It could be the case that adding one or two citizens will change the size of the RA but I'm not clear that this will make such a difference if we only know this when the polls open (or shortly after). The software to decide who has been elected is only run after the polls have closed and we should surely know how many citizens we have by that point.

I'd be happy to be corrected on the last point and, if we need to make the change, we could limit the period for raising objections to 14 days by passing a bill at the next RA meeting on 31 March.

Honi soit qui mal y pense
User avatar
Sudane Erato
Forum Wizard
Forum Wizard
Posts: 1183
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 8:44 am
Contact:

Re: Bill proposals: Citizenship and Electoral Reform

Post by Sudane Erato »

Patroklus Murakami wrote:

... it might take us up to the day the polls open. That's not such a big deal for the individual citizen, they still have up to a week to vote after all.

Maybe not for the individual citizen. But it's my understanding that the election machine programmer needs to know the complete citizen list BEFORE the polls open. We should probably find the exact mechanics out before we decide that this is or is not a critical issue.

I'm not convinced it's a problem for determining the size of the RA either. It could be the case that adding one or two citizens will change the size of the RA but I'm not clear that this will make such a difference if we only know this when the polls open (or shortly after). The software to decide who has been elected is only run after the polls have closed and we should surely know how many citizens we have by that point.

If this is true we better yell loudly and clearly that the number of RA seats being chosen may not be known until this time. It was just such confusion which contributed heavily to the last election fiasco.

Sudane..............................

*** Confirmed Grump ***
Profile: http://bit.ly/p9ASqg
Post Reply

Return to “Legislative Discussion”