Snapshot_1 NFS 2007_10_18 12 am - 2 pm
898 Scripts - 10.2 ms (low)
__________________
215*(0.004) = 0.860 ms
244*(0.005) = 1.220 ms
29*(0.006) = 0.174 ms
10*(0.007) = 0.070 ms
29*(0.008) = 0.232 ms
89*(0.009) = 0.801 ms
34*(0.010) = 0.340 ms
Snippet 1: 0.004-0.010 ms
total: 650 Scripts, load 3.697 ms
__________________
9*(0.011) = 0.099 ms
5*(0.012) = 0.060 ms
18*(0.013) = 0.234 ms
17*(0.014) = 0.238 ms
8*(0.015) = 0.120 ms
6*(0.016) = 0.096 ms
11*(0.017) = 0.187 ms
34*(0.018) = 0.612 ms
16*(0.019) = 0.304 ms
6*(0.020) = 0.120 ms
Snippet 2: 0.011-0.020 ms
total: 130 Scripts, load 2.070 ms
__________________
15*(0.021) = 0.315 ms
10*(0.022) = 0.220 ms
5*(0.023) = 0.115 ms
1*(0.024) = 0.024 ms
4*(0.025) = 0.100 ms
7*(0.026) = 0.182 ms
6*(0.027) = 0.162 ms
7*(0.028) = 0.196 ms
3*(0.029) = 0.087 ms
3*(0.030) = 0.090 ms
Snippet 3: 0.021-0.030 ms
total: 61 Scripts, load 1.491 ms
__________________
2*(0.031) = 0.062 ms
6*(0.032) = 0.192 ms
1*(0.034) = 0.034 ms
3*(0.035) = 0.105 ms
2*(0.036) = 0.072 ms
1*(0.037) = 0.037 ms
1*(0.039) = 0.039 ms
Snippet 4: 0.031-0.040 ms
total: 16 Scripts, load 0.541 ms
__________________
2*(0.041) = 0.082 ms
2*(0.045) = 0.090 ms
1*(0.046) = 0.046 ms
1*(0.047) = 0.047 ms
3*(0.048) = 0.144 ms
1*(0.049) = 0.049 ms
2*(0.050) = 0.100 ms
Snippet 5: 0.041-0.050 ms
total: 12 Scripts, load 0.558 ms
__________________
1*(0.051) = 0.051 ms
1*(0.052) = 0.052 ms
2*(0.053) = 0.106 ms
1*(0.054) = 0.054 ms
1*(0.058) = 0.058 ms
2*(0.060) = 0.120 ms
Snippet 6: 0.051-0.060 ms
total: 8 Scripts, load 0.441 ms
__________________
0.065 ms
0.067 ms
0.068 ms
0.075 ms
0.092 ms
0.094 ms
0.098 ms
0.099 ms
Snippet 7: 0.061-0.100 ms
total: 8 Scripts, load 0.658 ms
__________________
0.102 ms
0.131 ms
0.155 ms
0.165 ms
0.196 ms
0.210 ms
0.232 ms
Snippet 8: > 0.100 ms
total: 7 Scripts, load 1.191 ms
__________________
Control: 892 Scripts (6 missing), load 10.647 (went up)
__________________
__________________
Comment: took too long, next time debug window screenshots. If anyone wants to know about her/his scripts, call me. To look at a single owner's scripts and hand out a screenshot takes 5 minutes.
Sleazy, where do you get the number of 2,100 active scripts from?
The ban of continuosly listening scripts points in the right direction, because it refers to the script characteristic. There may be scripts that cause horrible spikes when they are triggered. Otoh, your well written script could loop all the time, if it would not take more than your share of the load *shrug
We need enough overhead space for events and meetings - mind, the load goes up to about 20 without visible reason... too many variables here... btw in that case the small scripts go up 1-2 microseconds at max, the low end 780 scripts would add about 2 ms, now tell me what causes the missing 8 ms? We need a snapshot at 20 as well...
I think it is the same as if you would run 900 little applications on your PC, as long as they are not called, they eat a little RAM, just waiting. We may need 2 dimensions to look at the scripts: the constant load and the usage spikes. The first one is visible in a calm hour like this, the second needs individual tests, and as long as nobody is interested in tests, we can switch off the top scripts and send a notice to the owner in case of trouble.
The AM covenant could adress the spikes: you have to stay within your limit, if you are not sure, you ask for a test. Constant load can be handeled with weight classes.
I should have added examples for each snippet, may be next time... some scripts like Moon's and Diannes doors are widespread, we could have a list of common scripts, my problem is, why should the 70% oneliners taking 35% of the resources be restricted first, but interpret the numbers yourself... and tell me wether the debug window is relyable at all.
If there is a floor of 1540 scripts we know the Top Script window is named by usage, not by content.