Direct TP Proposal for CN

Proposals for legislation and discussions of these

Moderator: SC Moderators

User avatar
Tanoujin Milestone
I need a hobby
I need a hobby
Posts: 538
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:42 pm

Re: Direct TP Proposal for CN

Post by Tanoujin Milestone »

Moon,
1. I painted red where you can end up under the street level if you tp from a beach altitude, that is 20 m, and referred to it as catacombes. (And i left out how much i like that CN has a cellar level). Fact is that i can walk down there with the only horizontal obstacle being the cloaca, and i can only get out if (without tp) if i find the very well hidden exit at the Minerva temple. I do not post theories in this case, as i did with the script count, i fetched the red brush after testing it.

2. I did not touch anything on the estate window, this was changed after the last RA meeting by Sudane exactly as requested, and would not even think of interfering with it until i am explicitely asked to do so by the Guild, Chancellor or RA.

3. If the knowledgebase is not outdated, telehub and direct TP are ment to be mutually exclusive approaches. Seeing this, i have another reason to keep away from this windows. KB recommends not to combine it, and so i don't do it. If there are tricks to combine both, someone experienced should take care of it.

4. We end up at Draxtor's because the parcel includes the 128/128 spot and he has already set the Landing point.

Sleazy:
1. Walls, well ok, why not.
2. Main Street: Know what, i just set it, you will see the disadvantages, and others will see other disadvantages, and so on. Please discuss it and give me coordinates :-) And dont make me a taxi Driver (If the 4 parcels were separate, we had no problem, what about this?)

Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.
Ian Maclaren
User avatar
Tanoujin Milestone
I need a hobby
I need a hobby
Posts: 538
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:42 pm

Re: Direct TP Proposal for CN

Post by Tanoujin Milestone »

Sleazy_Writer wrote:

Hm, I can't get that per-parcel-landingpoint working for my own CN parcel. But if it does work, Draxtor can solve the problem by setting his landing point outside of his front door: that's still Drax's land.

tp blocked.jpg
tp blocked.jpg (45.36 KiB) Viewed 1187 times

unblock your landing point

Update - my apologies, Sleazy, i see now you blocked it *because* of that issue. (Too bad! What now?)
All other parcels above the catacombes where the PLP is set work fine, unlucky fellow ;)
Let's see wether this will occur on the 10 parcels without PLP once more.
Anyone else having "My Parcel Landing Point is correctly set but does not work"?

Jo, Justice, Ludo, Rose, Ulysse, Bruno, Chicago, Michel:
If you dont get what this brawl is about: go down to the river and tp to your parcel(s) inside the walls
(Use the ugly green pyramide to get out from under the streets)

Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.
Ian Maclaren
User avatar
Patroklus Murakami
Forum Wizard
Forum Wizard
Posts: 1929
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 5:54 pm

Re: Direct TP Proposal for CN

Post by Patroklus Murakami »

The Bill introduced by ThePrincess (and copied above in this thread) was passed by the RA on Sunday 21 October.

Honi soit qui mal y pense
User avatar
Patroklus Murakami
Forum Wizard
Forum Wizard
Posts: 1929
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 5:54 pm

Re: Direct TP Proposal for CN

Post by Patroklus Murakami »

When I tested this out just now I ended up in Drax's place too. We're going to need to find a way to make sure that the convenience provided by this trial for the people who have requested it is not outweighed by the inconvenience meted out to others. It looks like there is a lot of TP parcel-setting (on public land) to be done by the Chancellor and his team to get this to work.

Honi soit qui mal y pense
User avatar
Tanoujin Milestone
I need a hobby
I need a hobby
Posts: 538
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:42 pm

Re: Direct TP Proposal for CN

Post by Tanoujin Milestone »

Things to be discussed on a technical level:
1. Can we heal Sleazy's PLP malfunction? (How are you doing, Sleazy?)
2. Can we / do we need to set a default rezz spot on the Forum? (How are you doing, Draxtor?)
3. Is there a need to subdivide the 4 Mainstreet parcels? (This connects to the naming discussion too)
4. Do people want a PLP on every public parcel (except the river?), eg the Praetorium?

##1 & 2 needs statements by concerned Citizens and NG expertise
#3 needs a proposal (?). #4 needs a simple request here or better IM me in world.

Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.
Ian Maclaren
User avatar
Sleazy_Writer
Master Word Wielder
Master Word Wielder
Posts: 429
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 6:38 am

Re: Direct TP Proposal for CN

Post by Sleazy_Writer »

Tanoujin Milestone wrote:

Things to be discussed on a technical level:
1. Can we heal Sleazy's PLP malfunction? (How are you doing, Sleazy?)
2. Can we / do we need to set a default rezz spot on the Forum? (How are you doing, Draxtor?)
3. Is there a need to subdivide the 4 Mainstreet parcels? (This connects to the naming discussion too)
4. Do people want a PLP on every public parcel (except the river?), eg the Praetorium?

##1 & 2 needs statements by concerned Citizens and NG expertise
#3 needs a proposal (?). #4 needs a simple request here or better IM me in world.

(1) Never mind, it's not important for me.
(2) You could ask Draxtor really nicely to sell the (128,128) point, a 4 x 4 m spot that's in his garden facing the city wall, and join it with the Forum parcel. Just an idea ... Or just let Drax handle it sounds fine too, he can always set the PLP point outside from his front door.
(3) Not for me, naming could be done with street signs and giving the parcel a general name.
(4) Probably not the long parcels, then people probably expect to land where they click the map.

User avatar
Tanoujin Milestone
I need a hobby
I need a hobby
Posts: 538
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:42 pm

Re: Direct TP Proposal for CN

Post by Tanoujin Milestone »

Brian has requested to change the main road landing point. I have cleared the PLP off now, because IMO any compromise is worse than no landing point. Reinstalling one of two local TPs under the street.

Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.
Ian Maclaren
Post Reply

Return to “Legislative Discussion”