This is a personal response and should not be held to represent the CSDF in any way (and in fact for the most part all of my posts should be considered as such.)
Heard at a recent RA meeting (after adjournment) all directed to Pat: “arseâ€, “poo poo head†(several times), “if you worked for me I would fire you†(that last is a masterwork of alpha-male one-upmanship.) Also attempts to force items to the agenda on the spot, members throwing a tantrum when Pat had to leave after two hours of meeting, very late in his area of the real world. A RA that remained in session and continued to pass one and debate other proposals without Pat or Leon present. A proposed constitutional amendment (later amended) that in its first draft was aimed at forcibly removing the LRA.
I agree, and I am pretty sure that Pat also agrees, that he does not always respond well to that kind of attack. I know that I don’t. But it was clear to me that any attempt from CSDF to stay in the RA would just be met with more of the same. CSDF stepping out, I think, has the consequence of giving us a breather from the fighting and a time to reflect on where we are going as a community. In the end, stopping the fighting seemed more important to me than any good we could done on legislation.
What I have heard from CSDF’s opposition on numerous occasions is that all that CSDF is interested in is power. That is ridiculous since we had majority never, and a plurality just once in the RA. All the CSDF members I know are much more interested in ideas and positive change, in building and creative work, and most importantly returning the CDS to a reasonably stable, responsible, state of governance.
It was not my nor other CSDF member’s intention to stop the RA from continuing to do its work. To the contrary. Once the SC rules (and if I understand the constitution, a special election is held to replace the two members that resigned) it is certainly free to do as it pleases.
And for those who want to continue the fighting, there is no practical purpose you can serve by continuing to attack the CSDF. With CSDF out of the RA we will have no say over bills at all. If you are interested in legislation, you might as well direct that attention to the people who will have a say.