Like Aliasi, I doubt I'll be able to make it to tomorrow morning's town hall. I'll try to keep these comments to the six topics outlined by Diderot, at least for now.
1) name change
I'm torn. The existing name has a lot of associations both good and bad. I would say the biggest argument against a name change is the implicit break with our own history, but I'm growing more comfortable with that idea as time passes.
One thing we should not ignore is the real cost of a name change. I'm sure LL will charge a not insignificant sum to change the sim name, then there are the groups to recreate and move people to.
2) Layout
Why not. I'm not wedded to it. I do think it should stay densely packed. See 3) below.
3) Terraform?
first of all, I like the clouds, No one else has done a city in SL at this altitude. That said, I know many dislike them and a little cloud goes a long way. I do worry about forcing other sims we add later to be at the same stratospheric heights. Much of the city layout is driven by the topography. The two must be addressed as a package.
If we want to leave the city high up, perhaps we could create a steeper slope, especially to the west, so an adjoining sim could be lower.
4) Theme
I'm not stuck on medieval Bavarian either, I do like something for the city proper that keeps the builds close together and enforces a pre modern architectural style. I happen to like Medieval, but that's me. If we loosen up too much, I worry that the verisimilitude of the city could be lost.