Abuse of authority

Here you might discuss basically everything.

Moderator: SC Moderators

User avatar
Carolyn Saarinen
Seasoned debater
Seasoned debater
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 2:12 pm

Post by Carolyn Saarinen »

[quote="TOPGenosse":tlhz8jr6]
Yes, sure I support tyranny.
Yes, sure I've "violated" your "privacy".
Yes, sure you've won the argument.
Carolyn, I humbly admit, you were always right.[/quote:tlhz8jr6]

All you have to do is please me and the pain stops. :lol:

"help, help, I'm being repressed by the straight-laced vanilla mundane"
michelmanen
I need a hobby
I need a hobby
Posts: 812
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 2:53 am

Post by michelmanen »

Diderot wrote:

[quote:2jdu3hk6][quote:2jdu3hk6]I am however unable to guess, who would be expected to perform moderation by the above logic in the case where somebody called "the entire SC a bunch of *****"[/quote:2jdu3hk6][/quote:2jdu3hk6]

This is precisely the reason why such issus must be brought in front of our Courts and why a moderator involved in such a matter and concommitently an SC members must recuse himself/herself froman SC decision in such a matter (should it become necessary).

Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”